Why feedback feels hard
Leads often juggle delivery pressure, limited examples, and fear of inconsistency across teams.
Without a shared rubric, feedback drifts into vague encouragement or surprise critiques.
Structured prompts, shared criteria, and a living grid remove the guesswork so leads can deliver specific, fair feedback.
Leads often juggle delivery pressure, limited examples, and fear of inconsistency across teams.
Without a shared rubric, feedback drifts into vague encouragement or surprise critiques.
The Calibration Framework gives common criteria for performance, potential, values, and risk—so leads anchor feedback to the same bar.
Inline prompts nudge for evidence: impact, behaviors, and timelines. That makes conversations specific instead of subjective.
The 3x3 grid shows distribution at a glance, helping spot rating drift or gaps before feedback lands.
Narratives and next steps stay visible across cycles, so follow-up is consistent and employees hear a single, aligned story.
6 min read
Human capital is the advantage. As AI accelerates, calibrating people—roles, readiness, and growth—matters more than the tools themselves.
5 min read
How to nominate successors, set readiness horizons, and build growth plans without pre-selecting “heirs.”
7 min read
Move from siloed performance conversations to shared standards that travel across teams and geographies.
Next up
Keep your teams aligned with a shared grid, guided forms, and role-aware access. Start now or jump straight back into the dashboard.